From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsey v. Dist. Attoreny's Office of Erie Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-64 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-64 Erie

10-03-2012

IRVIN DANIEL LINDSEY, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT ATTORENY'S OFFICE OF ERIE COUNTY, et al., Respondents.


Senior District Judge Maurice B. Cohill

Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas action filed by Petitioner, Irvin Daniel Lindsey, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for a report and recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges. On September 5, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [ECF No. 29] in which she recommended that the petition be denied with respect to each of Petitioner's claims and that a certificate of appealability ("COA") be denied. Petitioner has filed Objections [ECF Nos. 30 and 31] to the R&R. Furthermore, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Erie County Court of Common Pleas' motion to dismiss and strike [ECF No. 22] be granted.

Where, as here, Objections have been filed, the Court is required to make a de novo determination as to those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Court has carefully examined de novo all arguments raised by Petitioner in his Objections and the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that he is not entitled to habeas relief or a COA on any of his claims. Petitioner's Objections are overruled and the Court approves and adopts the R&R in its entirety.

After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation of the Plaintiff's Objections, the following Order is entered:

And now to-wit, this ___ day of ___ 2012, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. The Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 7] is DENIED.
2. Defendant Erie County Court of Common Pleas' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 22] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter dated September 5, 2012 [ECF No. 29] is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED.

______________

Maurice B. Cohill

Senior United States District Court Judge

Western District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Lindsey v. Dist. Attoreny's Office of Erie Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 3, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-64 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Lindsey v. Dist. Attoreny's Office of Erie Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:IRVIN DANIEL LINDSEY, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT ATTORENY'S OFFICE OF ERIE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-64 Erie (W.D. Pa. Oct. 3, 2012)