From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LINDSEY v. AL ESTEP

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 25, 2008
Civil Case No. 04-cv-01705-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 25, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 04-cv-01705-LTB-KLM.

April 25, 2008


ORDER


This case is before me on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Applicant's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition be denied and the case dismissed with prejudice. Applicant has now filed timely written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. I note that he does not object to the recommendation that Claim IV asserting deprivation of an extended proportionality review of this life sentence in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments be dismissed. I have reviewed the recommendation de novo in light of Applicant's objections and the file and record in this case. On such de novo review, I conclude that the Magistrate Judge's thorough and comprehensive recommendation is correct. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED that Applicant's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition is DENIED and the above action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

LINDSEY v. AL ESTEP

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 25, 2008
Civil Case No. 04-cv-01705-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 25, 2008)
Case details for

LINDSEY v. AL ESTEP

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY E. LINDSEY, Applicant, v. AL ESTEP, Warden, L.C.F., and THE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Apr 25, 2008

Citations

Civil Case No. 04-cv-01705-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 25, 2008)