From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsay v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 1, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-893 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-893

03-01-2013

MELVIN X. LINDSAY, Plaintiff v. JOHN WETZEL, et al., Defendants


ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2013, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. 49), to which no objections have been filed, and upon independent review of the record, the court finds no error in the R&R and concludes that the R&R should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Doc. 49) is ADOPTED.
2. Pursuant to the magistrate judge's recommendation, Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 34) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without leave to amend.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

______________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lindsay v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 1, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-893 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Lindsay v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN X. LINDSAY, Plaintiff v. JOHN WETZEL, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 1, 2013

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-893 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2013)