From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsay v. Unknown

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 4, 2009
No. CIV S-09-3260 CMK P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3260 CMK P.

December 4, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity jurisdiction, be brought only in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

In this case, it appears that the defendant(s) are located and the claim arose in Riverside and/or San Bernardino County, which are in the Central District of California. Therefore, plaintiff's claim should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.


Summaries of

Lindsay v. Unknown

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 4, 2009
No. CIV S-09-3260 CMK P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Lindsay v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LINDSAY, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 4, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3260 CMK P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2009)