From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsay v. Lawler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 22, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-0893 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-0893

02-22-2012

MELVIN X. LINDSAY, Plaintiff v. RAYMOND LAWLER, et al., Defendants


ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. 26), filed January 23, 2012, to which no objections were filed, and upon independent review of the record, it is ordered that:

1. The magistrate judge's report (Doc. 26) is adopted.
2. The motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Lawler, Jon Fisher, Corbin, Keller, Lovett, Zurybida, Krista Fisher, Bickell, C.M. Cook, and Eckard (Doc. 18) is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. 2) is DENIED.
4. The above-captioned case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

_______________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lindsay v. Lawler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 22, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-0893 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Lindsay v. Lawler

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN X. LINDSAY, Plaintiff v. RAYMOND LAWLER, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 22, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-0893 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2012)