LINDQUIST v. HEIM, L. P.

Full title: TINA LINDQUIST, Plaintiff, v. HEIM, L. P., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 23, 2007

Civil Action No. 04-249 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-249 Erie.

February 23, 2007

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SEAN McLAUGHLIN, District Judge

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 31, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 51], filed on December 11, 2006, recommended that Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 41] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendant. Defendant filed objections on December 28, 2006 [Doc. No. 55]. On February 20, 2007, the Court held oral argument on Defendant's objections.

After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, and following extensive oral argument on the Defendant's objections, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 23^rd day of February, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 41] is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 51] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on December 11, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.