From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindmark v. Heuer

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division
Nov 3, 2009
No. B205788 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2009)

Opinion


ROGER M. LINDMARK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HENRY T. HEUER, et al., Defendants and Respondents. B205788 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Seventh Division November 3, 2009

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC 349616

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 20, 2009 be modified as follows:

On page 9, delete heading II and replace it with the following:

“II. THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DENIED ENFORCEMENT OF THE ILLEGAL CONTRACT.”

There is no change in judgment.

PERLUSS, P. J. ZELON, J. JACKSON, J.


Summaries of

Lindmark v. Heuer

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division
Nov 3, 2009
No. B205788 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2009)
Case details for

Lindmark v. Heuer

Case Details

Full title:ROGER M. LINDMARK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HENRY T. HEUER, et al.…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division

Date published: Nov 3, 2009

Citations

No. B205788 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2009)