From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindley v. Lindley

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Dec 8, 2016
NO. 09-16-00414-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 8, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 09-16-00414-CV

12-08-2016

AURITA F. ARAUJO LINDLEY, Appellant v. WILLIAM DICK LINDLEY, Appellee


On Appeal from the 279th District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. F-225,100

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 7, 2016, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. The appellant, Aurita F. Araujo Lindley, then filed a motion for an extension of time to file her notice of appeal.

The trial court signed the judgment on June 24, 2016, and the appellate timetables were extended by the timely filing of a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Notice of appeal was due to be filed on September 22, 2016. Id. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 28, 2016, more than ninety days from the date of judgment and outside the period for which we may grant an extension of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Accordingly, we deny the motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice Submitted on December 7, 2016
Opinion Delivered December 8, 2016 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Lindley v. Lindley

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Dec 8, 2016
NO. 09-16-00414-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Lindley v. Lindley

Case Details

Full title:AURITA F. ARAUJO LINDLEY, Appellant v. WILLIAM DICK LINDLEY, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Dec 8, 2016

Citations

NO. 09-16-00414-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 8, 2016)