Opinion
22-cv-11767
08-13-2024
KEVIN LINDKE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAT KING, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DENYING REMAINDER OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 45)
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
On January 18, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (See Mot., ECF No. 45.) On May 17, 2024, the Court entered an order denying the motion in part, granting the motion in part, and taking under advisement the arguments in the motion presented under the heading in Defendants' brief labeled: “C. Plaintiffs' Claims are Barred Because They Failed to Meet the Procedural Prerequisites of the Act.” (See Order, ECF No. 58.)
On August 12, 2024, the Court held an on-the-record status conference and delivered an oral ruling addressing the arguments that it had previously taken under advisement. For the reasons stated on the record during that hearing, Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the basis of those arguments is DENIED. With the entry of this order, the Court has now resolved Defendants' motion for summary judgment in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.