From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindig Constr. v. J-M Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Feb 12, 2015
NO. 09-14-00371-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 12, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 09-14-00371-CV

02-12-2015

LINDIG CONSTRUCTION & TRUCKING, INC., Appellant v. J-M MANUFACTURING CO., INC. D/B/A JM EAGLE, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 12-11-12448 CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 19, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. Appellant did not respond to this Court's notice.

Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown that it is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk's record, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice
Submitted on February 11, 2015
Opinion Delivered February 12, 2015
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Lindig Constr. v. J-M Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Feb 12, 2015
NO. 09-14-00371-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Lindig Constr. v. J-M Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LINDIG CONSTRUCTION & TRUCKING, INC., Appellant v. J-M MANUFACTURING CO.…

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Feb 12, 2015

Citations

NO. 09-14-00371-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 12, 2015)