From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linderman v. Lackner

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 25, 2015
CV 15-02675-JVS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2015)

Opinion

          For Matthew Linderman, Petitioner: Rose Fay Arfa, LEAD ATTORNEY, Law Office of Fay Arfa ALC, Los Angeles, CA.

          For Heidi M Lackner, Warden, Respondent: Vincent P LaPietra, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Diego, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Linderman v. Lackner

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 25, 2015
CV 15-02675-JVS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Linderman v. Lackner

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW LINDERMAN, Petitioner, v. HEIDI M. LACKNER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 25, 2015

Citations

CV 15-02675-JVS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2015)