From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linden v. Hutzel Women's Hosp.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 29, 2014
853 N.W.2d 343 (Mich. 2014)

Opinion

Docket No. 149997. COA No. 321857.

09-29-2014

Howard T. LINDEN, as Conservator of Chelsie Barker, a minor, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. HUTZEL WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, Defendant–Appellee, and Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University, R. Dinsay, Suchada Nopachai, M.D., Carmen Schlitt, R.N., and D. Walker, R.N., Defendants.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2014 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Linden v. Hutzel Women's Hosp.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 29, 2014
853 N.W.2d 343 (Mich. 2014)
Case details for

Linden v. Hutzel Women's Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:Howard T. LINDEN, as Conservator of Chelsie Barker, a minor…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 29, 2014

Citations

853 N.W.2d 343 (Mich. 2014)
497 Mich. 871

Citing Cases

Barker v. Hutzel Women's Hosp.

We also granted plaintiff's motion to stay, which prevented the trial court from considering and deciding…