From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindemann v. Seder

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 29, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00815-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00815-REB-BNB.

August 29, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before me on the following:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Defense Counsel [Doc. # 16, filed 7/31/2006] (the "Motion to Disqualify"); and

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Reply to Counterclaim [Doc. # 20, filed 8/17/2006] (the "Motion to Amend").

I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Disqualify is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Amend is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the Amended Reply to Counterclaim [Doc. # 20-2] attached as an exhibit to the Motion to Amend.


Summaries of

Lindemann v. Seder

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 29, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00815-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Lindemann v. Seder

Case Details

Full title:PETER F. LINDEMANN, d/b/a ALL `N' ONE CUSTOM PROMOTIONALS, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00815-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2006)