From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindell v. Office of Dir. of Nat'l Intelligence

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Sep 16, 2024
1:23-mc-78 (ACR-MAU) (D.D.C. Sep. 16, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-mc-78 (ACR-MAU)

09-16-2024

MICHAEL J. LINDELL, et al., Plaintiffs v. OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, Defendant.


[D. Minn. Case No. 22-cv-98-WMW-JFD]

ORDER

ANA C. REYES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

My Pillow, Inc. and Michael Lindell, Defendants in the underlying action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, moved to compel a third party, John Negroponte, to comply with a deposition subpoena. Mot. to Compel, ECF No. 1. This Court referred the Motion to Magistrate Judge Moxila A. Upadhyaya for determination. Minute Order on Dec 18, 2023.

On August 22, 2024, Magistrate Judge Upadhyaya issued a [10] Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court deny Defendants' [1] Motion to Compel. Magistrate Judge Upadhyaya advised the parties that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3(b), “any party who objects to the Report and Recommendation must file a written objection with the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the party's receipt of this Report and Recommendation.” Report & Recommendation, ECF No. 10 at 13. Magistrate Judge Upadhyaya further advised the parties that “[f]ailure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth in this Report may waive that party's right of appeal from an order of the District Court that adopts such findings and recommendation.” Id. (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed by either party, and the deadline for filing any such objections has now passed. Accordingly, it is, this 16th day of September, 2024, hereby

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Moxila A. Upadhyaya's [10] Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED for the reasons stated therein; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' [1] Motion to Compel is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lindell v. Office of Dir. of Nat'l Intelligence

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Sep 16, 2024
1:23-mc-78 (ACR-MAU) (D.D.C. Sep. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Lindell v. Office of Dir. of Nat'l Intelligence

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. LINDELL, et al., Plaintiffs v. OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL…

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Sep 16, 2024

Citations

1:23-mc-78 (ACR-MAU) (D.D.C. Sep. 16, 2024)