Opinion
6:21-cv-1417-RBD-DCI
05-22-2023
LENA MARIE LINDBERG, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN OAKS; JOE PINSKER; JAMES ADAMS; RALPH GARCIA; SHADRICK CARTER; WILL NEWMAN; LISA GERMAN; JERROD GERWIG; JOHN BARBERI; JOHN DOE; and MATHEW STONEQUIST, Defendants.
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON, JR., United States District Judge.
Plaintiff filed the pro se Complaint against Defendants. (Doc. 1.) Over a year after the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint, she moved to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 20; Doc. 23 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends the Court deny the Motion because the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Doc. 29 (“R&R”).) The time has passed and there were no objections, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The R&R (Doc. 29) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
2. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 23) is DENIED. Plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to notify the Eleventh Circuit of this Order in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4).
DONE AND ORDERED.