Opinion
6:21-cv-1783-RBD-DCI
05-22-2023
LENA MARIE LINDBERG, Plaintiff, v. ROBIN C. LEMONIDIS; LORI TODD; F. BARBERI, E. MCKINNON; DAVID GILLESPIE; OFFICER ANASTASIA; MELANIE GRISWOLD; RENEE PURDEN; JEFFREY M. PEARSON; PETER GAUNTLETT; RICHARD T. WILEY; UNKNOWN; UNKNOWN; PLAMEN NATCHEV; SCOTT CARVER; and SUE FRANK, Defendants.
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge
Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendants. (Doc. 1.) Over a year after the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint, she moved to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 14; Doc. 16 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends the Court deny the Motion because the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Doc. 22 (“R&R”).) The time has passed and there were no objections, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The R&R (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
2. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 16) is DENIED. Plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to notify the Eleventh Circuit of this Order in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4).
DONE AND ORDERED.