Opinion
6:21-cv-1746-RBD-GJK
04-18-2023
LENA MARIE LINDBERG, Plaintiff, v. VINCENT ALBERT CITRO; UNKNOWN BREVARD COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER EMPLOYEE #1; UNKNOWN BREVARD COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER EMPLOYEE #2; CARLY CHRISTENSEN; RICHARD APPLEBAUM; KIMBERLY BARDING; C. THOMPSON; HADI KHOURI; BRUCE BARNETT; JIM BLISS; KELLI; LAURIE; LORI FRANCIS; UNNAMED GUNMAN; AUBREY BARBER; SAMUAL EDWARDS; PHILIP GLEN ARCHER; M. MATHERS; PATRICIA REGO CHAPMAN; KELLY CHASE; DAVID SILVERMAN; UNNAMED “AUCTIONEER”; DAVID WILES; CRAIG FINKLESTEIN; HAROLD UHRIG; ROBERT BLAISE TRETTIS; “GAIL”; JAQUELYN ARES; ROBERT DAWIDIUK; UNNAMED BURGLARY ACCOMPLICE #1; UNNAMED BURGLARY ACCOMPLICE #2; UNNAMED BURGLARY ACCOMPLICE #3; JEANNIE HOFFHINE; DAVID BUTLER; CHRISTOPHER SHAW; GEORGE PENLEY; TUCKER MODERSON; EDWARD MELVIN FITZGERALD; BRUCE LEE ASSAM; JINELLE GILLETTE; and ERIC THOMPSON, Defendants.
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendants, alleging theft, illegal arrest, sexual assault, grand larceny, and other crimes. (Doc. 1.) Over a year after the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint, she moved to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 13; Doc. 17 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick recommends the Court deny the Motion because the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Doc. 20 (“R&R”).) Plaintiff did not object to the R&R, but rather filed another IFP motion. (See Doc. 21.) To the extent this additional filing is meant as an objection to the R&R, it is due to be overruled; it does not cure any deficiencies identified in the R&R and rehashes arguments the Court has found unavailing many times over. (See id. (“Objection”)); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). So the R&R is due to be adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The Objection (Doc. 21) is OVERRULED.
2. The R&R (Doc. 20) is ADOPTED, CONFIRMED, and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
3. Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. 17) is DENIED. Plaintiff’s appeal is not taken in good faith.
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to notify the Eleventh Circuit of this Order in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4).