Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Auth

2 Citing cases

  1. Damus v. County of Clark

    93 Nev. 512 (Nev. 1977)   Cited 12 times
    In Damus, supra, we noted that it was probable that Washoe County would have 200,000 inhabitants at the time of the publication of the 1980 census.

    The voters in those counties now or hereafter qualifying are not denied equal protection should their county elect to circumvent electoral authorization. Cantwell v. Hudnut, 419 F. Supp. 1301 (S.D. Ind., 1976); Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Auth., 496 P.2d 1174 (Okla. 1972). Finally, appellant contends that the General Obligation Bond Commission failed to comply with certain provisions of NRS 350.001 et seq., and its action was therefore void.

  2. McAlester Urban Renewal Authority v. Cuzalina

    1973 OK 144 (Okla. 1974)   Cited 6 times

    Larger cities contain more slum and blighted areas than smaller cities, therefore, the need for urban renewal in larger cities is more pressing, and under these circumstances population is a legitimate ground for classification in urban renewal law. Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Auth., Okla., 496 P.2d 1174; Isaacs v. Oklahoma City, Okla., 437 P.2d 229. Therefore, since we have determined urban renewal condemnations may be classified separately from other condemnations for purposes of awarding attorney fees, we conclude § 1613, supra, and § 1663, supra, were constitutional at the time of their enactment even though there was no urban renewal statute applicable to towns of less than 10,000 population.