From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lind v. S. Glazer's Wine & Spirits

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 21, 2018
5:17-CV-0717 (BKS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2018)

Opinion

5:17-CV-0717 (BKS/ATB)

05-21-2018

TOBY LIND, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE & SPIRITS, et al., Defendants.

Appearances: Toby Lind North Syracuse, New York Plaintiff, pro se


Appearances: Toby Lind
North Syracuse, New York
Plaintiff, pro se Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Judge :

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Toby Lind commenced this action pro se asserting claims for employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. (Dkt. No. 1). This matter was assigned to United States Magistrate Andrew T. Baxter who, on April 12, 2018, issued a Report-Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve his original complaint or to file and serve an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 16). Magistrate Judge Baxter advised Plaintiff that under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days within which to file written objections to the report, and that the failure to object to the report within fourteen days would preclude appellate review. (Dkt. No. 16, at 5). No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.

As no objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed, and the time for filing objections has expired, the Court reviews the Report-Recommendation for clear error. See Petersen v. Astrue, 2 F. Supp. 3d 223, 228-29 (N.D.N.Y. 2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the Report-Recommendation for clear error and found none, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation in its entirety.

For these reasons, it is

ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 16) is ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to serve the original complaint or to file and serve an amended complaint; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 21, 2018

Syracuse, New York

/s/ _________

Brenda K. Sannes

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Lind v. S. Glazer's Wine & Spirits

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 21, 2018
5:17-CV-0717 (BKS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Lind v. S. Glazer's Wine & Spirits

Case Details

Full title:TOBY LIND, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE & SPIRITS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 21, 2018

Citations

5:17-CV-0717 (BKS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2018)