From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lind v. Port of New York Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 10, 1967
28 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

October 10, 1967


Order entered February 2, 1967, opening plaintiffs' default and restoring case to calendar unanimously reversed on the facts and on the law, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants, and motion denied. In this nonpreferred negligence action, plaintiffs defaulted on the calendar call of November 15, 1965. Judgment was entered December 10, 1965. Plaintiffs' attorney claims the default was due to neglect of an answering service but concedes that the records of the service do not confirm this claim. In any event, he admits knowledge of the default judgment in July, 1966. No motion for relief was made until November 30, 1966. The consistent pattern of delay precludes the granting of the motion ( D'Aprile v. Schoenfield, 25 A.D.2d 722).

Concur — Stevens, J.P., Eager, Steuer, Rabin and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Lind v. Port of New York Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 10, 1967
28 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Lind v. Port of New York Authority

Case Details

Full title:JUDITH LIND et al., Respondents, v. PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Raoul Charbonneau Custom Logging v. Belanger

Defendant offers no explanation for his failure to submit such a proposal. Considering these examples of…

Jackson v. Bader

We note that the defendants' attorney in this action, I. Walton Bader, is also one of the defendants, and…