From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lincoln Service v. Rivera

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 25, 1946
187 Misc. 607 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)

Opinion

October 25, 1946.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, McNULTY, J.

Abraham Epstein for appellant.

Benjamin H. Schor for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


The agreement sued upon is unenforcible because it lacks mutuality of obligation. ( Lincoln Service, Inc., v. Mack's Grill, Inc., N.Y.L.J., June 15, 1946, p. 2389, col. 3.)

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to defendant, and complaint dismissed with appropriate costs in the court below.

MacCRATE, SMITH and FENNELLY, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Lincoln Service v. Rivera

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 25, 1946
187 Misc. 607 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
Case details for

Lincoln Service v. Rivera

Case Details

Full title:LINCOLN SERVICE, INC., Respondent, v. MARCIAL RIVERA, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1946

Citations

187 Misc. 607 (N.Y. App. Term 1946)
68 N.Y.S.2d 155

Citing Cases

Dennis Realty Corp. v. Twersky

Under such circumstances there is no consideration and the contract cannot be enforced." (To like effect are:…

J.D. H. Enterprises Corp. v. Byrne

The paper was unilateral; there was no mutuality, and therefore, it was not enforcible by either party." (See…