From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linares v. Kudlack

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Dec 4, 2007
9:03-CV-1408 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2007)

Opinion

9:03-CV-1408 (LEK/RFT).

December 4, 2007


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on September 26, 2007 by the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 85). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Patricio Linares, which were filed on October 11, 2007. Objection (Dkt. No. 87).

It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.

Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 85) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 77) is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Linares v. Kudlack

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Dec 4, 2007
9:03-CV-1408 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Linares v. Kudlack

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIO LINARES, Plaintiff, v. R.N. KUDLACK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Dec 4, 2007

Citations

9:03-CV-1408 (LEK/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2007)

Citing Cases

Padilla v. Corr. Care Sols.

See Am. Compl. at 3-4, 9. "A medical need is considered serious if it presents 'a condition of urgency that…

Jackson v. Loricchoandola

In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff has failed to plead facts suggesting that he suffered from a serious…