From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lim v. Brown (In re Brown)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
No. 11-03894 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-03894 CW

10-24-2011

In re: CAROLINE BROWN, Debtor. SUMI LIM, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CAROLINE BROWN, Defendant/Appellee.


ORDER REGARDING BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

On October 5, 2011, the Court granted Appellant Sumi Lim fourteen additional days in which to file her opening brief, which was due on October 19, 2011. On October 18, 2011, Appellant filed a document entitled, "Bankruptcy Court Prohibits the Continuation of This Case," in which she indicates that Debtor/Appellee Caroline Brown received a discharge in her bankruptcy case and, as a result, Appellant cannot continue this appeal. Appellant indicates that she will cease to litigate this case.

The Court knows of no rule that prevents an appeal of an adversary proceeding after the debtor has received a discharge in the underlying bankruptcy case. However, if the appellant does not seek and obtain a stay pending appeal, the appeal may be moot. See Fed. Rules Bankr. Proc. 8005. Furthermore, the Court notes that Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006 requires that the record on appeal include the judgment, order or decree appealed from, and any opinion, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court. Furthermore, Bankruptcy Local Rule 8007-1 requires that the record on appeal include a transcript of the hearing of the bankruptcy court at which the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. The record on appeal designated by Appellant includes the bankruptcy court's August 11, 2011 Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion to Correct Clerical Error in June 30, 2011 Order. The record does not contain the opinion or findings of fact and conclusions of law of the bankruptcy court or the transcript of the relevant hearing.

In light of the above, if Appellant wishes to proceed with her appeal, within seven days from the date of this order, she must file with the Court a declaration to that effect. If she fails to file a declaration within this time period, her appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If she timely notifies the Court that she wishes to proceed with her appeal, she must perfect the record and file her opening brief within twenty-one days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge

RE:CAROLINE BROWN, Plaintiff,

v.

RE:CAROLINE BROWN et al, Defendant.

Case Number: CV11-03894 CW

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.

That on October 24, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

USBC Manager-San Francisco United States Bankruptcy Court

235 Pine Street

P.O. Box 7341

San Francisco, CA 94120-7341

Sumi Lim

1815 Spruce St. #203

Berkeley, CA 94709

Thomas E. Carlson

U.S. Bankruptcy Court

235 Pine Street

P.O. Box 7341

San Francisco, CA 94120-7341

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Lim v. Brown (In re Brown)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
No. 11-03894 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Lim v. Brown (In re Brown)

Case Details

Full title:In re: CAROLINE BROWN, Debtor. SUMI LIM, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CAROLINE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

No. 11-03894 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)