From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lilly v. Pham

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Oct 27, 2016
No. 08-16-00135-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. 08-16-00135-CV

10-27-2016

JERRY LILLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A WESTAR INDUSTRIES, Appellant, v. CHRIS PHAM, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR ALEX PHAM, Appellee.


Appeal from 352nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas (TC # 352-280346-15) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Jerry Lilly, Individually and d/b/a Westar Industries, has failed to file his brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant has not filed his brief or an extension motion, and he has not filed any response to the inquiry. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). October 27, 2016

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.


Summaries of

Lilly v. Pham

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Oct 27, 2016
No. 08-16-00135-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Lilly v. Pham

Case Details

Full title:JERRY LILLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A WESTAR INDUSTRIES, Appellant, v. CHRIS…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Date published: Oct 27, 2016

Citations

No. 08-16-00135-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 27, 2016)