From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lilly v. Norman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2013
No. 1:11CV0088 HEA (E.D. Mo. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:11CV0088 HEA

01-31-2013

JAROD ALEXANDER LILLY, Plaintiff, v. JEFF NORMAN, et al., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its own motion. Plaintiff filed this action on May 18, 2011, against ten defendants. For over a year, the Court has dealt primarily with dismissing named defendants for plaintiff's failure to bring a valid claim, and for failure to prosecute altogether. At this time, two defendants -Dr. Jarrod Flood and Debbie Judy- have not yet been served because plaintiff has not provided the Court with their current addresses.

Rule 4(m) permits the Court to dismiss an action against a defendant without prejudice if a defendant is not served within 120 days after a complaint is filed. Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen days of the date of this order why these four defendants should not be dismissed under Rule 4(m). If plaintiff fails to show adequate cause, the Court will dismiss these four defendants without prejudice.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause why defendants Dr. Jarrod Flood and Debbie Judy should not be dismissed from this action without prejudice for lack of timely service.

______________________

HENRY EDWARD AUTREY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lilly v. Norman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2013
No. 1:11CV0088 HEA (E.D. Mo. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Lilly v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:JAROD ALEXANDER LILLY, Plaintiff, v. JEFF NORMAN, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

No. 1:11CV0088 HEA (E.D. Mo. Jan. 31, 2013)