From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lilly v. Fassler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 16, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02738-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02738-REB-MEH

08-16-2011

CURTIS L. LILLY, Plaintiff, v. MR. JASON FASSLER, Correctional Officer, Fremont Correctional Facility, and MR. ROBERT BEAUMONT, Correction Officer, Fremont Correctional Facility, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on August 16, 2011.

Plaintiff's [Motion for] Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint in Accordance with the Recommendation and all Applicable and Federal Court Rules [filed August 12, 2011; docket #47] is denied without prejudice. In order to determine whether justice requires that Plaintiff be granted leave, the Plaintiff must attach a proposed "second amended complaint" to his request for leave.


Summaries of

Lilly v. Fassler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 16, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02738-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Lilly v. Fassler

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS L. LILLY, Plaintiff, v. MR. JASON FASSLER, Correctional Officer…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02738-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 16, 2011)