From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lilly v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 31, 2011
1:08CV53 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2011)

Opinion

1:08CV53.

March 31, 2011


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on September 10, 2009, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff timely objected to the Recommendation.

The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment seeking a reversal of the Commissioner's decision [Docket No. 11] be DENIED, that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Docket No. 14] be GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be AFFIRMED, and that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

This, the 30th day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Lilly v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 31, 2011
1:08CV53 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Lilly v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SALLIE E. LILLY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Mar 31, 2011

Citations

1:08CV53 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2011)