From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lillis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 30, 1977
347 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 1977)

Opinion

No. 50186.

June 30, 1977.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen, and Sidney M. Pertnoy and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lillis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 30, 1977
347 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 1977)
Case details for

Lillis v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD LILLIS, PETITIONER, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 30, 1977

Citations

347 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 1977)