affirming summary judgment where plaintiff offered no evidence that her supervisors did not sincerely believe that she had performance problems when she was terminated
Summary of this case from Charles v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.No. 05-P-184.
June 20, 2006.
Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28. Judgment affirmed.
affirming summary judgment where plaintiff offered no evidence that her supervisors did not sincerely believe that she had performance problems when she was terminated
Summary of this case from Charles v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Full title:DIANE M. LILJESTRAND v. FIRST ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Jun 20, 2006
But even if true, that fact, on its own, is insufficient to demonstrate pretext. See, e.g., Liljestrand v.…
Chiaretto v. Starwood Hotels Resorts WorldwideAt the first stage, of the McDonnell Douglas framework, Chiaretto must establish a prima facie case of…