From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liles v. Bowser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 20, 2015
Case: 1:15-cv-01423 (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2015)

Opinion

Case: 1:15-cv-01423

08-20-2015

HAYWOOD LILES, Petitioner, v. MURIEL BOWSER, et al., Respondents.


Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 8/31/2015
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil
MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the petition.

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondents to issue him a District of Columbia driver's license. See Pet. at 1-2. "The extraordinary writ of mandamus is available to compel an 'officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to plaintiff,' 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (emphasis added), and the Court therefore has no authority to compel the Mayor of the District of Columbia or the remaining respondents to provide the relief petitioner requests. See Powell v. Washington Teachers Union, 968 F. Supp. 2d 267, 267 (D.D.C. 2013) (dismissing mandamus petition, because "the Court . . . cannot compel either the Washington Teachers Union or the Chancellor of the District of Columbia Public Schools to provide the relief petitioner demands").

The petition for a writ of mandamus will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. DATE: 8/20/15

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Liles v. Bowser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 20, 2015
Case: 1:15-cv-01423 (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Liles v. Bowser

Case Details

Full title:HAYWOOD LILES, Petitioner, v. MURIEL BOWSER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Aug 20, 2015

Citations

Case: 1:15-cv-01423 (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2015)