From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lilah R. v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division
Oct 20, 2011
Case No.: CV-11-1860 MEJ (MED) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: CV-11-1860 MEJ (MED)

10-20-2011

LILAH R., by and through her guardian ad litem, ELENA A.; Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY SMITH, WILLIAM HUYETT, BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and DOES 1 through 20; Defendants.

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL S. SORGEN Joyce Kawahata Attorneys for Plaintiff, LILAH R., by and through her guardian ad litem, ELENA A . DAVIS & YOUNG, APLC Mark Davis Attorneys for Defendant, ANTHONY SMITH EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP James M. Marzan Attorney for Defendants BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and WILLIAM HUYETT


MICHAEL S. SORGEN (SBN 43107)

JOYCE KAWAHATA (SBN 113159)

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL S. SORGEN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARK E. DAVIS, Esq. (79936)

DAVIS & YOUNG APLC

Attorneys for Defendant

ANTHONY SMITH

JAMES M. MARZAN, Esq. (133931)

Edrington, Schirmer & Murphy LLP

Attorneys for Defendants BERKELEY UNIFIED

SCHOOL DISTRICT and WILLIAM HUYETT

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO

COMPLETE ADR

Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James

The parties and the court-appointed mediator, Kathryn Dickson, have conducted a pre-mediation telephone conference during which they set the mediation on December 2, 2011, the soonest date available for all parties and the mediator.

In the event a following session or further negotions are required to reach resolution, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in this action, through their designated counsel, that the period to complete ADR be extended to December 31, 2011. The mediator concurs in the extension.

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL S. SORGEN

Joyce Kawahata

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

LILAH R., by and through her

guardian ad litem, ELENA A.

DAVIS & YOUNG, APLC

Mark Davis

Attorneys for Defendant,

ANTHONY SMITH

EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP

James M. Marzan

Attorney for Defendants BERKELEY

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and

WILLIAM HUYETT
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X.B.

I, Joyce Kawahata, attest that concurrence in the electronic filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 12th day of October 2011 at San Francisco, California.

Joyce Kawahata

Attorneys for plaintiff LILAH R.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Maria-Elena James

United States District Chief Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Lilah R. v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division
Oct 20, 2011
Case No.: CV-11-1860 MEJ (MED) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Lilah R. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:LILAH R., by and through her guardian ad litem, ELENA A.; Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Case No.: CV-11-1860 MEJ (MED) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)