Lightsey v. State

Full title: Tavarus LIGHTSEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

351 So. 3d 135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D20-376

11-10-2022

Tavarus LIGHTSEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Alcorn v. State, 121 So. 3d 419, 430 (Fla. 2013) ("In Florida, trial courts and prosecutors have [the] discretion [to accept or reject a plea]."); Odegaard v. State, 137 So. 3d 505, 508 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("Even where trial counsel's misadvice results in a defendant's rejection of a favorable plea offer, the State is not required to reoffer its original plea on remand."); Vennisee v. State, 235 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (citing Davis v. State, 223 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017, for the proposition that a juvenile who commits a substantive violation of probation as an adult is not entitled to be sentenced under Florida's juvenile sentencing scheme); Woods v. State, 314 So. 3d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021), review denied, SC21-269, 2021 WL 2434584 (Fla. June 15, 2021) ; Connolly v. State, 172 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).