From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lightning v. Pipefitters

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Dec 2, 2005
CASE NO. 1:05 CV 2105 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 2, 2005)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:05 CV 2105.

December 2, 2005


ORDER


This action was filed on September 1, 2005. In an entry dated September 15, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to either pay the filing fee or file a signed, completed request to proceed in forma pauperis. Although that 30-day period has well expired, plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or filed an appropriate in forma pauperis application, nor has he sought additional time to do so.

Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a) (3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lightning v. Pipefitters

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Dec 2, 2005
CASE NO. 1:05 CV 2105 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 2, 2005)
Case details for

Lightning v. Pipefitters

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL LIGHTNING, Plaintiff, v. LOCAL 120 PIPEFITTERS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Dec 2, 2005

Citations

CASE NO. 1:05 CV 2105 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 2, 2005)