From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LightHouse for Blind & Visually Impaired of S.F. v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 20, 2021
4:20-cv-09020-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2021)

Opinion

4:20-cv-09020-HSG

08-20-2021

LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED OF SAN FRANCISCO, a California non-profit corporation; and ERIN LAURIDSEN and FRANK WELTE, individuals, Plaintiffs, v. AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, INC., a Delaware corporation; ADP TOTALSOURCE, INC., a Florida corporation; and DOES 1-5, Defendants.


(San Francisco Superior Court No. CGC-20-586626)

Complaint Filed: September 17, 2020

Current Response Dated: August 20, 2021

New Response Dated: September 20, 2021

ORDER GRANTING FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

In light of the Parties' Stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' Stipulation and ORDERS that Defendants Automatic Data Processing, Inc, and ADP TotalSource, Inc. shall have an extension of time of thirty (30) days in which to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint to September 20, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

LightHouse for Blind & Visually Impaired of S.F. v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 20, 2021
4:20-cv-09020-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2021)
Case details for

LightHouse for Blind & Visually Impaired of S.F. v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED OF SAN FRANCISCO, a…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 20, 2021

Citations

4:20-cv-09020-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2021)