From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lightfoot v. Cater

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Aug 9, 2018
Case No. 5:16-cv-00583-VEH-TMP (N.D. Ala. Aug. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5:16-cv-00583-VEH-TMP

08-09-2018

REGINALD TYRONE LIGHTFOOT, Petitioner, v. DERRICK CATER, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 1, 2018, the magistrate judge filed his Report and Recommendation in the above-styled cause, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed without prejudice. No objections from either party have been filed. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, the court is of the opinion that the report is due to be ADOPTED, and the recommendation ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the above-styled cause is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. An order of final judgment will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

DONE this the 9th day of August, 2018.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lightfoot v. Cater

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Aug 9, 2018
Case No. 5:16-cv-00583-VEH-TMP (N.D. Ala. Aug. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Lightfoot v. Cater

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD TYRONE LIGHTFOOT, Petitioner, v. DERRICK CATER, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 9, 2018

Citations

Case No. 5:16-cv-00583-VEH-TMP (N.D. Ala. Aug. 9, 2018)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Ellington

A Rule 32 petition that is time-barred under the one-year limitation period in Ala. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c) is…