From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Light v. Mullins

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 13, 1984
454 So. 2d 981 (Ala. 1984)

Opinion

83-383.

July 13, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Madison County, Thomas Younger, J.

Dan W. McCoy, Huntsville, for appellant.

Robert E. Willisson, Huntsville, for appellee.


Robert Light brought suit against Randall Mullins for a determination of the proper sum of money necessary to redeem certain real estate from a mortgage foreclosure sale to Randall Mullins. The trial judge found that $38,862.63 was the proper sum. In this amount was an item for removal of an outbuilding by Mullins. Light objects to his having to pay for the removal.

After reviewing the evidence, we cannot say that the trial judge committed error. Consequently, under the ore tenus rule, the judgment is affirmed. Chism v. Hicks, 423 So.2d 143 (Ala. 1982).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON, EMBRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Light v. Mullins

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 13, 1984
454 So. 2d 981 (Ala. 1984)
Case details for

Light v. Mullins

Case Details

Full title:Robert LIGHT v. Randall MULLINS

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jul 13, 1984

Citations

454 So. 2d 981 (Ala. 1984)