From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Light v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2011
NO. 1:11 cv 01268 GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 1:11 cv 01268 GSA PC

09-08-2011

JAMES LAWRENCE LIGHT, JR., Plaintiff, v. B. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

Plaintiff has filed a request to dismiss this action. Specifically, Plaintiff indicates that he no longer seeks to pursue this action. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(I), Plaintiff may dismiss this action, so long as a responsive pleading has not been filed. No defendants have been served, and a responsive pleading has not been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed, without prejudice, on Plaintiff's motion. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Light v. McDaniel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2011
NO. 1:11 cv 01268 GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Light v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LAWRENCE LIGHT, JR., Plaintiff, v. B. McDANIEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

NO. 1:11 cv 01268 GSA PC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)