From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Light v. Kleinginna

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 2, 1929
144 A. 925 (Ch. Div. 1929)

Opinion

01-02-1929

Samuel L. LIGHT et al., Complainants v. George L. KLEINGINNA et al., Defendants.

Higbee & Higbee, of Atlantic City, for complainants. Carlton Godfrey, of Atlantic City, for defendants.


On bill of complaint. On final hearing. Conclusions.

Higbee & Higbee, of Atlantic City, for complainants.

Carlton Godfrey, of Atlantic City, for defendants.

INGERSOLL, Vice Chancellor. The Hotel Stanley Corporation was incorporated on the 13th day of July, 1917, for the purpose of conducting the Stanley Hotel. Prior to July 1, 1924, there had been issued 927 shares of capital stock, of which the present complainants held 484 shares, and the defendant and his wife and other associates held 453 shares. The company may be considered as having been a close corporation, with the said George L. Kleinginna as manager of the hotel, and to a greater or lesser degree acting as and for the corporation. The bill is filed to set aside and cancel the following shares of stock: Fifteen shares issued to Kleinginna and 15 shares to Mrs. Kleinginna on May 1, 1926; 20 shares issued to Mr. and Mrs. Kleinginna on May 29, 1926; and 13 shares to Mrs. Kleinginna on May 2, 1927. The shares were issued at par, although it is alleged that the actual value thereof was much greater.

At the time of the hearing, the real Issue appeared to be an attempt to obtain control by the Kleinginna interest of the company, by obtaining a voting majority of the stock. Later I was advised by the solicitor of defendant "that one of the above complainants sold out his interest in the litigation to my client, which gave the defendant the entire control. Afterwards a meeting was held, and the other two complainants were placed on the board of directors, and I saw no reason after that situation occurred for filing a brief."

My attention is now called to the fact that the two remaining complainants desire a determination as to the validity of the issuance of said shares of stock. I find as a fact that said 63 shares of stock were illegally issued and should be canceled. I will advise a decree that, upon the payment by the company to the holders of said stock of the amount paid therefor, together with legal interest thereon, less any dividends received, said stock shall be canceled.

In the event of the refusal of the company to make such payments, the complainants may make application for further relief.


Summaries of

Light v. Kleinginna

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 2, 1929
144 A. 925 (Ch. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Light v. Kleinginna

Case Details

Full title:Samuel L. LIGHT et al., Complainants v. George L. KLEINGINNA et al.…

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 2, 1929

Citations

144 A. 925 (Ch. Div. 1929)