From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liggins v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1777 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1777 GEB EFB P

10-19-2011

PHILLIP v. LIGGINS, Petitioner, v. mike Mcdonald, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's October 7, 2011 request for appointment of counsel is denied.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Liggins v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1777 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Liggins v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP v. LIGGINS, Petitioner, v. mike Mcdonald, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1777 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)