Liggins v. City of Utica

Full title: JASON LIGGINS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF UTICA, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 23, 2014

6:14-CV-446 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2014)

Opinion

6:14-CV-446

12-23-2014

JASON LIGGINS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF UTICA, Defendant.

THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge

DECISION & ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 8] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Order and Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Order and Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 8] for the reasons stated therein. The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 23, 2014

/s/_________

Thomas J. McAvoy

Senior, U.S. District Judge