From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lifshits v. Variety Poly Bags

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted November 29, 2000.

December 19, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gigante, J.), dated April 18, 2000, which denied her motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ginsberg Broome, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Robert M. Ginsberg of counsel), for appellant.

Jaffe Nohavicka, New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for respondents.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The plaintiff established a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the defendant Variety Poly Bags and the driver of its truck, the defendant Anthony P. Ray. Since the defendant driver was under a duty to maintain a safe distance between the defendants' car and the plaintiff's car (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 Veh. Traf.[a]), his failure to do so, in the absence of a nonnegligent explanation, constituted negligence as a matter of law (see, Leal v. Wolff, 224 A.D.2d 392; Silberman v. Surrey Cadillac Limousine Serv., 109 A.D.2d 833). The affidavit of the defendant driver and the police accident report, which state, inter alia, that the plaintiff's car stopped short when the traffic light turned red, were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Leal v. Wolff, supra).


Summaries of

Lifshits v. Variety Poly Bags

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Lifshits v. Variety Poly Bags

Case Details

Full title:RITA LIFSHITS, APPELLANT, v. VARIETY POLY BAGS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 630

Citing Cases

Park v. Moreiras

( Mitchell v Gonzalez, 269 AD2d 250, 251). In the Second Department it is clear that the rule is that a claim…

Ortiz v. Witthuhn

Additionally, in a rear-end collision situation, the driver to the rear bears the duty to maintain a safe…