From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lifschutz v. Dramen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

November, 1916.


The plaintiff is not entitled to go to trial without paying the costs already imposed. His neglect to pay these costs has interfered with a diligent prosecution of his action. The order appealed from is so modified as to provide that the complaint be dismissed, with ten dollars costs, unless the plaintiff pay the costs heretofore imposed, and notice this case for trial at the January, 1917, term; and as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P.J., not voting.


Summaries of

Lifschutz v. Dramen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Lifschutz v. Dramen

Case Details

Full title:HARRY LIFSCHUTZ, an Infant, by LOUIS LIFSCHUTZ, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)