From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lietzke v. County of Montgomery

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 3, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-943-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 3, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-943-WKW.

March 3, 2008


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 7) that the case is due to be dismissed prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). No objection has been filed. After an independent review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 7) is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part with respect to res judicata;

2. The following claims are DISMISSED with prejudice: the federal claims against Judge McKinney; the federal claims against Sheriff Marshall in his official capacity; and all claims for criminal prosecution;

3. The following claims are DISMISSED without prejudice: all state law tort claims; and

4. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Lietzke v. County of Montgomery

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Mar 3, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-943-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Lietzke v. County of Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Mar 3, 2008

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-943-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

On October 2, 2007, the same day that Lietzke filed this action, he filed a complaint in the Southern…

Edwards v. Axogen, Inc.

As pro se filings are construed liberally, the Court finds that Mr. Edwards has included Axogen Inc. as a…