Lietzke v. County of Montgomery

Full title: BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Jan 22, 2007

Civil No. 06-1410-ST (D. Or. Jan. 22, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-1410-ST.

January 22, 2007

ORDER

GARR KING, District Judge

The Honorable Janice Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on December 26, 2006. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#7).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction over any defendant.