From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv858-MHT (M.D. Ala. Dec. 21, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv858-MHT

12-21-2018

BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY and KEVIN MURPHY, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered on this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 8) are overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 7) is adopted.

(3) Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. no. 2) is granted.

(4) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice, with no costs taxed.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 21st day of December, 2018.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv858-MHT (M.D. Ala. Dec. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY and KEVIN MURPHY…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv858-MHT (M.D. Ala. Dec. 21, 2018)