From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv858-MHT (M.D. Ala. Dec. 21, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv858-MHT

12-21-2018

BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY and KEVIN MURPHY, Defendants.


OPINION

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting a variety of constitutional claims stemming from an encounter with the police. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be granted but that plaintiff's case be dismissed. Plaintiff has filed objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 21st day of December, 2018.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv858-MHT (M.D. Ala. Dec. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Lietzke v. City of Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY and KEVIN MURPHY…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18cv858-MHT (M.D. Ala. Dec. 21, 2018)