From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lier v. Bloomingdale Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 8, 1948
274 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

November 8, 1948.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County.


Plaintiff failed to adduce any evidence whatever showing that the dog in question had previously manifested vicious propensities or that defendant had any actual or constructive notice thereof.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs and disbursements to appellant.

Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the complaint dismissed. [See post, p. 1032.]


Summaries of

Lier v. Bloomingdale Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 8, 1948
274 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Lier v. Bloomingdale Bros.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC LIER, an Infant, by ELEANOR NORBERG, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1948

Citations

274 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Lagoda v. Dorr

e had been trained and used as a watchdog; that the respondents knew he had jumped on people prior to the…