From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lien v. City of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 1, 2022
21-cv-224-MMA (WVG) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-224-MMA (WVG)

12-01-2022

MANDY LIEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO ALLOW PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN EXHIBIT THAT IS NOT ABLE TO BE EFILED [Doc. No. 56]

HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Mandy Lien and Erin Smith's (“Plaintiffs”) unopposed ex parte motion to allow them to file exhibits that cannot be e-filed in support of their Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. See Doc. Nos. 54, 56. In their motion, Plaintiffs state that “they informed Defendants that this ex parte application would be filed and served [on November 30, 2022] with the video exhibits on flash drive, which Defendants agreed was fine.” Doc. No. 56 at 2.

Upon due consideration, good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the motion. Plaintiffs may file their video files in support of their Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual § 2(k).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lien v. City of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 1, 2022
21-cv-224-MMA (WVG) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Lien v. City of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:MANDY LIEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 1, 2022

Citations

21-cv-224-MMA (WVG) (S.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2022)