From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liebmann's Sons Brewing Co. v. Cody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1897
21 App. Div. 235 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

October Term, 1897.

Henry Daily, Jr., for the appellants.

Edward V. Slauson, for the respondent.


Assuming that an account is alleged in the complaint within the meaning of section 531 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the copy attached to the complaint was a sufficient compliance with the requirement of that section. The verification was also sufficient, inasmuch as the account was expressly made a part of the complaint, which was duly verified.

No further bill of particulars is necessary, or would be appropriate. There is no allegation or proof that the defendants' officers or agents are ignorant of what the plaintiff will attempt to prove as to the quantities of beer sold, the dates of the deliveries or the prices charged.

The motion was properly denied, and the order of the Special Term should be affirmed.

All concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Liebmann's Sons Brewing Co. v. Cody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1897
21 App. Div. 235 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Liebmann's Sons Brewing Co. v. Cody

Case Details

Full title:S. LIEBMANN'S SONS BREWING COMPANY, Respondent, v . RICHARD CODY and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1897

Citations

21 App. Div. 235 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
47 N.Y.S. 669