From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lidsky v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1962
18 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

December 3, 1962


In an action to declare fraudulent and void as to the plaintiffs a judgment which the defendant Ida Abrahams had obtained against the defendants Klein, and to vacate and set it aside to the extent necessary to satisfy the plaintiffs' judgment against the said Kleins, and for other relief, the plaintiffs appeal: (a) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 6, 1961, which granted the motion of the defendant Abrahams for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and which severed the action, as against her; and (b) from the judgment in her favor, entered March 3, 1961, on said order. Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No issue was raised in the papers on appeal as to the defendant Abrahams' inadvertent failure, in her answer, to deny the allegations of paragraph twelfth of the complaint; nor does it appear that said failure to deny was raised as an issue at Special Term. Apparently, at Special Term, the issues were submitted on the facts shown in the affidavits and in the exhibits. When motions are involved and where "all parties to a litigation choose to do so, they may to a large extent chart their own procedural course through the courts" ( Stevenson v. News Syndicate Co., 302 N.Y. 81, 87). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lidsky v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1962
18 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Lidsky v. Klein

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LIDSKY et al., Appellants, v. IRVING KLEIN et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1962

Citations

18 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Web Transmissions, Inc. v. Jetro Automatic Transmission, Inc.

To that extent, therefore, the parties have charted their own procedural course. (See Lidsky v. Klein, 18…

Automatic Bedding Corp. v. Ortner

Order entered October 19, 1964 affirmed, without costs. The parties chose to submit the issues of the…